{"id":44289,"date":"2026-05-08T08:00:00","date_gmt":"2026-05-08T12:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.sinclairclarion.com\/home\/?p=44289"},"modified":"2026-05-08T14:57:26","modified_gmt":"2026-05-08T18:57:26","slug":"ranked-choice-voting-banned-in-ohio-but-gains-momentum-in-virginia","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.sinclairclarion.com\/home\/featured\/2026\/05\/08\/ranked-choice-voting-banned-in-ohio-but-gains-momentum-in-virginia\/","title":{"rendered":"Ranked Choice Voting banned in Ohio, but gains momentum in Virginia"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Ranked Choice Voting (RCV) is an election reform effort that has both gained and lost traction across the country in recent years.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Also called instant-runoffs, it involves ranking candidates on a single ballot<\/a> in order of preference. If one\u2019s preferred candidate doesn\u2019t win, their vote transfers to their second choice and so on until a majority is reached.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Other countries such as Ireland and Australia have used the system for more than 100 years, and several U.S. states have followed.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"
An infographic on how Ranked Choice Voting works. <\/strong>CAMPAIGNLEGAL.ORG<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

Supporters of RCV say that current U.S. elections follow a \u201cwinner take all\u201d format where a candidate may win without a true majority of votes, usually by splitting the vote of another party. They say this \u201cplurality voting\u201d leads to ugly campaign tactics and discourages voters from going outside the two major political parties for fear their voice will be wasted.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Opponents of RCV<\/a> say the system is confusing and could even lead to people leaving their polling centers without having voted properly. They also cite concerns that manually counting ranked votes on a large scale would be a long, labor-intensive process with more room for error; and if automated, counting would require significant, costly software updates.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

President Donald Trump is among those opposed to implementing RCV, calling it \u201cdisastrous and very fraudulent\u201d as he urged Alaskan voters to stop its use<\/a> in 2024.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"
Virginia recently expanded the pilot program for RCV, implementing the system permanently on multiple levels.<\/strong> ADOBE STOCK<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

As some states advance the use of this system, others are working to block it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The first U.S. jurisdiction to adopt RCV<\/a> was Ashtabula, Ohio in 1915. Now, Ohio is the most recent state to have passed laws banning it. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

On March 17, Gov. Mike DeWine signed a bill into law<\/a> that prohibits Ohio elections from using RCV on any level. Indiana also passed a law banning its use in February, following bans in West Virginia, Kansas, Wyoming and more.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

At the same time, Virginia is strengthening their use<\/a> of RCV. Following a pilot program that was intended to run from 2021-2031 on local levels, the state passed a law on April 22 that made the program permanent and increased the number of localities who could use it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Connecticut and Maryland are also seeing advancements in legislation to adopt the system, and its first use in Washington, D.C. will take place this June for its primary elections.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hannah Kichline, multimedia editor<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Check out more from The Clarion:<\/p>\n\n\n